Opinion Piece – Labour won the rural vote – and just wasted it. Ed Dungait.

Cllr Ed Dungait attended our Rural Forum and has since written this opinion piece published in the Newcastle Journal and shared here with Ed’s permission.

SIR Keir Starmer had a chance to secure the rural vote for a gen­er­a­tion, yet in just two years he utterly blew it. It is remark­able to think what an oppor­tun­ity he had, yet squandered.

His taste of oppor­tun­ity began in Feb­ru­ary 2023, when he appeared on stage in front of me and hun­dreds of farm­ers at the National Farm­ers’ Union Con­fer­ence and gave an impress­ive pitch. He coveted our sup­port and from many in the room he got it. On the day he out­shone PM Rishi Sunak’s brief and rather unen­ti­cing video mes­sage. Some farm­ers left that con­fer­ence intend­ing to vote Labour for the first time of their lives.

Fif­teen months later Labour went on to win an his­toric land­slide vic­tory, gain­ing around 100 rural seats, not least here in Northum­ber­land which saw all four seats turn­ing red, one for the first time ever. What an oppor­tun­ity this could be for the party to cement itself in rural Bri­tain for years to come, with a few sens­ible and sup­port­ive policies, you would think.

Rachel Reeves stood at the des­patch box six months later and sent farm­ing fam­il­ies across the nation into melt­down with a single sen­tence, stat­ing that inher­it­ance tax relief would be removed from farm­land. In one sen­tence she wasted all of that poten­tial the Labour Party had in rural Bri­tain. Over a year of coun­try­wide protests, meet­ings and nego­ti­ations seemed to fall on deaf ears until even­tu­ally, a par­tial U-turn was made.

How on earth it could take so long to accept they had got it wrong is baff­ling and shows a com­plete eco­nomic and polit­ical ineptitude. Listen­ing to an inter­view with Reeves before the elec­tion my primary con­cern was that she simply didn’t have the nous for such an import­ant job in gov­ern­ment, and my fears were jus­ti­fied. As Madeline Grant of The Spec­tator put it neatly, “The Treas­ury had floated this idea to many Chan­cel­lors, but Reeves was the only one stu­pid enough to go ahead with it”.

In one astound­ing inter­view Starmer said that we can either fund the NHS or keep a tax break for farm­ers. What an absurd argu­ment. The pro­jec­ted income from the Fam­ily Farm Tax would not have fun­ded the NHS for a single day. Moreover, sur­veys con­sist­ently show that the most respec­ted occu­pa­tions in the opin­ion of voters are nurses at num­ber one, fol­lowed by farm­ers at num­ber two. Our own Prime Min­is­ter decided to face them off against each other in a des­per­ate attempt to back up his own flawed policy. What awful lead­er­ship.

I still struggle to work out whether this whole debacle was car­ried out as a delib­er­ate vin­dict­ive policy, or was simply due to com­plete ignor­ance of agri­cul­tural affairs.

Extra taxes on fer­til­iser, pick-ups, oil boil­ers and attempts to ban wood burn­ing stoves can all be added to this.

Aside from farm­ing, I’m afraid to say that the rural exper­i­ence of this gov­ern­ment hasn’t been much bet­ter.

The recent revalu­ation of hos­pit­al­ity ven­ues for busi­ness rates affected towns and cit­ies alike, but the Gov­ern­ment failed to appre­ci­ate the dev­ast­at­ing effect this could have on rural vil­lages. In the coun­tryside a pub is often the heart of a vil­lage, play­ing a vital role in the com­munity.

It took another wave of protests and Labour MPs being banned from pubs until it finally sunk in. A 15% relief was at last offered but some pubs in Northum­ber­land have had their rate­able val­ues more than double, put­ting their viab­il­ity at risk.

The Gov­ern­ment’s coun­cil fund­ing review in Feb­ru­ary saw dra­matic increases of funds going to met­ro­pol­itan city coun­cils, at the expense of rural coun­cils like Northum­ber­land. There could not be a much clearer dis­play of how unim­port­ant rural Bri­tain is to Labour.

The A1 in Northum­ber­land des­per­ately needs dualling. It is essen­tial for the safety of road users and the local eco­nomy. Before Starmer came to power the A1 dualling had been given formal devel­op­ment con­sent. Within months he scrapped the whole plan. Fund­ing is still being provided for many urban-based trans­port projects, but it seems rural Northum­ber­land is at the bot­tom of the list.

I com­mend local rep­res­ent­at­ives of all parties who have spoken strongly on the topic, and I hope cross-party con­sensus can make pro­gress here. That will rely on a sens­ible gov­ern­ment chan­ging tack and listen­ing to us though.

And finally, when the Labour party runs out of ideas, they will always revert back to coun­tryside cul­ture wars. Starmer’s gov­ern­ment planned to restrict game shoot­ing sea­sons in a point­less man­ner that would do noth­ing to help con­ser­va­tion, and to ban trail hunt­ing which would not bene­fit wild­life what­so­ever.

They even said these policies were some of their pri­or­it­ies in gov­ern­ment. This is a des­per­ate attempt to hold on to a tiny pro­por­tion of urban voters but will fur­ther ali­en­ate huge swathes of rural people.

In 2015 Labour MP Maria Eagle pub­lished her report on “Labour’s Rural Prob­lem” high­light­ing exactly that. She stressed that an obses­sion with these cul­ture wars dis­trac­ted the party from the real issues facing the rural eco­nomy. Just 11 years later her sis­ter Angela was Min­is­ter for Rural Affairs in Starmer’s gov­ern­ment, yet the party still does not seem to have heeded Maria’s advice at all.

Of all the issues facing this coun­try, it is bizarre to think these cul­ture wars can still be a part of their plans.

In just two years Keir Starmer achieved all this. He used his 100 rural MPs to back up his gov­ern­ment, then threw them under the bus with ter­rible policies. It is no sur­prise he lost all sup­port.

Andy Burnham now has the oppor­tun­ity to change tack on all of this.

Will he finally start legis­lat­ing for us, not against us?

Will his offer of ‘hope in every heart’ extend to rural Bri­tain?

If it does, he may still have a chance to offer those rural MPs a frac­tion of a hope of re-elec­tion.